BenchmarkXPRT Blog banner

Category: tech press

Recent WebXPRT mentions in tech press articles, reviews, and more!

Justin Greene
By Justin Greene
on June 4, 2026

We’ve been excited to see steady growth in the number and variety of media outlets discussing WebXPRT around the world—especially WebXPRT 5. Tracking WebXPRT’s reach in the global tech press—with both English- and non-English-speaking audiences—helps us assess how well WebXPRT’s effectiveness as a benchmarking tool is translating across geographies and cultures.

One way we track WebXPRT’s reach is by paying attention to how much people use and discuss the benchmark in ads, articles, or tech reviews. We call each of those instances a “mention.” We know that our readers won’t see all of those mentions during their normal reading, so we occasionally like to share a sample of recent WebXPRT mentions here in the blog. Whether you just started following WebXPRT or you’re a longtime blog reader, we hope you’ll enjoy exploring the links below!

Recent WebXPRT mentions include the following:

  • PCMag used WebXPRT 5 in an article comparing the speed of the Apple Safari, Brave, Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge, and Mozilla Firefox browsers.
  • Intel referenced WebXPRT 5 performance scores in a press release and product brief for Core Series 3 processors.
  • Tom’s Hardware included WebXPRT 5 in an updated list of recommended CPU benchmarks.
  • Notebookcheck published WebXPRT 5 scores for more than 50 devices on its Benchmark and Test Results page, including the Alienware 16 Area-51, Apple MacBook Pro 16 2025 M5 Pro, ASUS ROG Zephyrus Duo, Lenovo Legion 7 16, MSI Prestige 16 AI, and Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra.
  • Microsoft’s Windows Performance Lab published a range of benchmark results that included WebXPRT 4 scores for devices from a wide range of vendors, including an array of Dell laptops.
  • Other outlets that have published articles, ads, or reviews mentioning WebXPRT in the last few months include the following: 3DNews.ru (Russia), AboutChromebooks.com, Alibaba.com (China), BenchLife.info (China), ComputerBase (Germany), iPon (Germany), ITC.ua (Ukraine), Mobasai (Taiwan), Phoronix, TechRadar, Tweakers, XFastest (Taiwan), and ZDNET Korea, among many others.

On a related note, if you’d like to receive monthly updates on XPRT-related news and activity, we encourage you to sign up for our XPRT newsletter. It’s completely free, and all you need to do to join the newsletter mailing list is let us know! We never publish, share, or sell any of the contact information our readers provide, and we’ll only send you the monthly newsletter and occasional benchmark-related announcements, such as important news about patches or releases.

If you have any questions or comments about WebXPRT 5 or the XPRTs in general, please feel free to contact us. We love to hear from the folks that are using our benchmarks!

Justin

Posted in Apple, ASUS, benchmark, Benchmark metrics, Benchmarking, BenchmarkXPRT, Brave, browser performance, Browser-based benchmarks, Chrome, Cross-platform benchmarks, Firefox, Google Chrome, Intel, Microsoft, Microsoft Edge, Mozilla, Performance benchmarking, Safari, Samsung, tech press, WebXPRT, WebXPRT 4, WebXPRT 5 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

WebXPRT 5 source code access is on the way

Justin Greene
By Justin Greene
on March 12, 2026

Recently, a member of the tech press asked us if we were planning to offer a way for users to set up an offline version of WebXPRT 5 for locally hosted tests. The short answer is “yes.”

The long answer is that the question provides us with a good opportunity to talk about XPRT source code access and let new users know how it works.

Since the early days of the BenchmarkXPRT Development Community, we’ve provided free access to the benchmark source code. We believe that by publishing XPRT code and allowing interested parties to access and review that code, we’re doing our part to encourage transparency and honesty in the benchmarking industry.

While we offer free access to the XPRT source code, our approach to derivative work differs from some traditional open-source models that encourage developers to alter products and even take them in substantially different directions. Because benchmarking requires a product that remains static to enable valid comparisons, we prioritize maintaining the integrity and consistency of the benchmark over time. So, we allow people to download the source, but we also reserve the right to control derivative works. This approach discourages a situation where someone publishes an unauthorized version of the benchmark and calls it an “XPRT.”

For WebXPRT 5, we’ll offer the code in the form of a build package—containing all the necessary files and instructions—that will be available upon request. By offering the code upon request, as opposed to posting a permanent download link, we can prevent bots or other malicious actors from downloading it. This method also lets us engage with users interested in the source code and answer their questions.

With the WebXPRT 5 build package, you’ll be able to set up your own WebXPRT 5 instance for purposes of review, internal testing, or experimentation. We do ask that you publish only test results from the official version of WebXPRT 5 that we host at WebXPRT.com.

We expect to have the build package ready within the next few weeks. When it’s available, we’ll let readers know here in the blog, and we’ll provide more details about the access and setup process.

If you have any questions about accessing the WebXPRT 5 source code, please let us know!

Justin

Posted in benchmark, Benchmarking, BenchmarkXPRT, BenchmarkXPRT development community, browser performance, Browser-based benchmarks, Collaborative benchmark development, Performance benchmarking, Source code, tech press, Web-based testing, WebXPRT, WebXPRT 5 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , |

WebXPRT appearances in recent articles, reviews, and more!

Justin Greene
By Justin Greene
on February 5, 2026

Over the last few weeks, we’ve been excited to see steady growth in the number of people running the WebXPRT 5 Preview—as well as how widely distributed those runs are around the world. To get a picture of WebXPRT’s approximate global reach, we run the IP address data from our database through a program that provides general city- and country-level location information. By tallying that location data, we can better understand where people are running WebXPRT. By the way, this is the most detailed information we have, and all test data will remain completely anonymous unless you submit it for publication.

Based on that info—along with direct feedback from users—we’ve determined that OEM labs, tech press journalists, and individual consumers have already run the WebXPRT 5 Preview in more than 125 cities across 35 countries!

Test run data is just one of the ways that we track the progress we’re making toward our goal of providing all interested parties with benchmark tools that are reliable, relevant, and free to use. Another important way we track progress toward that goal is by paying attention to how much people use and discuss the XPRTs. When the name of one of our apps appears in an ad, article, or tech review, we call it a “mention.” Tracking those kinds of mentions helps us gauge our reach.

From time to time, we like to share a sample of recent XPRT mentions here in the blog. If you just started following the XPRTs, it may be surprising to see our global reach. Whether you’re a new visitor to the XPRT blog or a longtime reader, we hope you’ll enjoy exploring the links below!

Recent mentions include:

If you’d like to receive monthly updates on XPRT-related news and activity, we encourage you to sign up for our XPRT newsletter. It’s completely free, and all you need to do to join the newsletter mailing list is let us know! We won’t publish, share, or sell any of the contact information you provide, and we’ll only send you the monthly newsletter and occasional benchmark-related announcements, such as important news about patches or releases.

If you have any questions about the WebXPRT 5 Preview or the XPRTs in general, please feel free to contact us.

Justin

Posted in Acer, AMD, ASUS, benchmark, Benchmark metrics, Benchmarking, Benchmarking computing devices, BenchmarkXPRT, browser performance, Browser-based benchmarks, Chrome, Cross-platform benchmarks, Dell, Firefox, HP, Laptops, Lenovo, Microsoft, Performance benchmarking, Samsung, tech press, WebXPRT, WebXPRT 4, WebXPRT 5 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

Check out the new XPRTs around the world infographic!

Justin Greene
By Justin Greene
on January 30, 2025

As we look forward to continued growth for the XPRTs in 2025, it’s also a fitting time to take stock of just how much their reach has already grown around the globe. In the marketing world, reach is often defined as the size of the audience that sees and/or engages with your content. We track XPRT reach with several metrics—including completed test runs, benchmark downloads, and mentions of the XPRTs in advertisements, articles, and tech reviews. Gathering this information gives us insight into how many people are using the XPRTs, and it provides a sense of the impact the XPRTs are having around the world. It also helps us understand the needs of those who use them.

From time to time, we publish an updated version of an “XPRTs around the world” infographic, which features highlights from the reach metrics we track. This week, we published a new version of the infographic that includes the following highlights:

  • Over 4,100 unique sites have collectively mentioned the XPRTs more than 20,500 times.
  • Those mentions include more than 12,900 tech articles and reviews.
  • XPRT tech press mentions and test runs have originated in over 983 cities located in 84 countries on six continents. New cities of note include San Salvador, El Salvador; Salamanca, Mexico; Fes, Morocco; Wanaka, New Zealand; and Luzern, Switzerland.

In addition to the reach metrics we mention above, the XPRTs have now delivered more than 2,020,000 real-world results! We’re grateful for everyone who’s used the XPRTs and has spread the word to others. Your active involvement makes it possible for us to achieve our overall goals: to provide benchmark tools that are reliable, relevant, free, and simple to use.

Justin

Posted in BenchmarkXPRT, BenchmarkXPRT development community, tech press, WebXPRT, WebXPRT 4 | Tagged , , , , , , , , |

Recent XPRT mentions in the global tech press

Justin Greene
By Justin Greene
on January 2, 2025

One way we assess the XPRTs’ ongoing effectiveness is to regularly track the reach of our benchmarks in the global tech press. If tech journalists decide to include an XPRT benchmark in their suite of “go-to” performance evaluation tools, we know that decision reflects a high degree of confidence in the relevance and reliability of our benchmarks. It’s especially exciting for us to see the XPRTs win the trust of more tech press outlets in an ever-increasing number of countries around the world.

Because some of our newer readers may be unaware of the wide variety of tech press outlets that use the XPRTs, we occasionally like to share an overview of recent XPRT-related global tech press activity. For today’s blog, we want to give readers a sampling of the press mentions we’ve seen over the past few months.

Recent mentions include:

If you’d like to receive monthly updates on XPRT news, we encourage you to sign up for the BenchmarkXPRT Development Community newsletter. Each month, the newsletter delivers a summary of the previous month’s XPRT-related activity, including XPRT blog posts and new mentions of the XPRTs in the tech press. If you don’t currently receive the monthly BenchmarkXPRT newsletter but would like to join the mailing list, please let us know! It’s free to join. We won’t publish, share, or sell any of the contact information you provide, and we’ll send you only the monthly newsletter and occasional benchmark-related announcements, such as news about patches or new releases.

If you have any questions about the XPRTs, suggestions for improvement, or requests for future blogs, please just contact us.

Justin

Posted in Acer, Apple, ASUS, benchmark, browser performance, CrXPRT, HP, Samsung, tech press, WebXPRT 4 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

How to automate your WebXPRT 4 testing

Justin Greene
By Justin Greene
on August 22, 2024

We’re excited about the ongoing upward trend in the number of completed WebXPRT 4 runs that we’re seeing each month. OEM and tech press labs are responsible for a significant amount of that growth, and many of them use WebXPRT’s automation features to complete large blocks of hands-off testing at one time. We realize that many new WebXPRT users may be unfamiliar with the benchmark’s automation tools, so we decided to provide a quick guide to WebXPRT automation in today’s blog. Whether you’re testing one or 1,000 devices, the instructions below can help save you some time.

WebXPRT 4 allows users to run scripts in an automated fashion and control test execution by appending parameters and values to the WebXPRT URL. Three parameters are available:

  • test type
  • test scenarios
  • results

Below, you’ll find a description of those parameters and instructions for how you can use them to automate your test runs.

Test type

The WebXPRT automation framework accounts for two test types: (1) the six core workloads, and (2) any experimental workloads we might add in future builds. There are currently no experimental tests in WebXPRT 4, so always set the test type variable to 1.

  • Core tests: 1

Test scenario

The test scenario parameter lets you specify which subtest workloads to run by using the following codes:

  • Photo enhancement: 1
  • Organize album using AI: 2
  • Stock option pricing: 4
  • Encrypt notes and OCR scan using WASM: 8
  • Sales graphs: 16
  • Online homework: 32

To run a single subtest workload, use its code. To run multiple workloads, use the sum of their codes. For example, to run Stock options pricing (4) and Encrypt notes and OCR scan (8), use the sum of 12. To run all core tests, use 63, the sum of all the individual test codes (1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + 16 + 32 = 63).

Results format

The results format parameter lets you select the format of the results:

  • Display the result as an HTML table: 1
  • Display the result as XML: 2
  • Display the result as CSV: 3
  • Download the result as CSV: 4

To use the automation feature, start with the URL https://www.principledtechnologies.com/benchmarkxprt/webxprt/2021/wx4_build_3_7_3, append a question mark (?), and add the parameters and values separated by ampersands (&). For example, to run all the core tests and download the results, you would use the following URL: https://principledtechnologies.com/benchmarkxprt/webxprt/2021/wx4_build_3_7_3/auto.php?testtype=1&tests=63&result=4

We hope WebXPRT 4’s automation features will make testing easier for you. If you have any questions about WebXPRT or the automation process, please feel free to ask!

Justin

Posted in Automation, benchmark, Benchmark metrics, Benchmarking, browser performance, Browser-based benchmarks, Performance benchmarking, results, tech press, WebXPRT, WebXPRT 4 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , |

Check out the other XPRTs:

Forgot your password?
© Principled Technologies, Inc. 2026   |   Privacy policy

Cookie Notice: Our website uses cookies to deliver a smooth experience by storing logins and saving user information. By continuing to use our site, you agree with our usage of cookies as our privacy policy outlines.

x