BenchmarkXPRT Blog banner

Endurance

In There’s always something new to measure, we proposed several possible tests for the next version of WebXPRT. Of those, battery life testing generated the most interest.

Battery life testing poses a number of challenges. It’s not as simple as making WebXPRT loop. The biggest challenge is that different devices take different measures when the battery runs low. These measures range from dimming the screen, to stopping the hard disk, to totally shutting down the device. While these are perfectly reasonable, they are out of the benchmark’s control. Worse, most current browsers offer no way of knowing that these measures even happen nor do they offer good ways of querying the device to find out the state of its battery. We want to make sure that our approach does not unfairly advantage one device over another and gives a fair and accurate measure.

Because WebXPRT is a hosted application, we are looking at one of the other XPRT benchmarks for our first attempt at adding battery life to an existing benchmark. MobileXPRT seems to be the best fit. It runs on Android, which has a functional API for monitoring and managing power events, and the diversity of the Android ecosystem forces the benchmark to deal with a greater range of devices and OS configurations than TouchXPRT.

We are trying a number of approaches, and we have made some progress. We will discuss what we have learned in the next few weeks.

Our hope is that what we learn from MobileXPRT will better equip us to add battery life testing to WebXPRT.

Have any thoughts or comments? Post to the forums or e-mail benchmarkxprtsupport@principledtechnologies.com to let us know.

-Bill

Comment on this post in the forums

Designated Drivers

As we mentioned in last week’s blog On to the next thing, we have seen some problems running HDXPRT 2012 on the Windows 8.1 preview, build 9460. To date, the failures we’ve seen have been in Media Espresso’s Power Director on systems using third and fourth generation Intel Core processors.

We are happy to say that HDXPRT 2012 runs fine on the preview of Windows 8.1 when using the Windows 8.1 Preview Beta Graphics Driver. We are continuing to test, but things are looking good. You can get the graphic driver at communities.intel.com/docs/DOC-21232. We tested with version 15.33.10.3214, which is the latest version available as I am writing this.

If you see problems when running HDXPRT 2012, please let us know.

As I said last week, we are pushing forward on the development of HDXPRT 2013. We are looking forward to releasing a preview to the community in the next few weeks.

Eric

Comment on this post in the forums

On to the next thing

Last week, we released MobileXPRT 2013 to the public and published it as a free app on Google Play. On Monday, we will release the source code to the community. It hasn’t been long since we released the source code for MobileXPRT CP 1.1, but it’s an important part of the community model that the source for the current version is available to the community.

While we were putting the finishing touches on MobileXPRT, we’ve been hard at work on HDXPRT 2013. The feedback on HDXPRT made it clear that the benchmark should be smaller, faster, and easier to install. We have been working to keep all the value of the benchmark, and update the workloads to reflect current usage, even as we slim it down.

Speaking of HDXPRT, as we mentioned in The show is in previews, HDXPRT 2012 has issues running on Windows 8.1. However, we have had some success getting HDXPRT to run on Windows 8.1 by using beta drivers from Intel, AMD, and NVIDIA. We are still investigating this, and hope to have a general workaround for this soon.

There’s lots more stuff in the pipeline. Exciting times ahead!

Eric

Comment on this post in the forums

Time to Play

As Bill said in MobileXPRT 2013 lives!, we released MobileXPRT 2013 to the public on Monday. Since that time, we have published MobileXPRT as a free app in the Google Play Store. You can find it by searching for “mobilexprt” or you can get it here. Downloading the app from the store simplifies the installation, but in all other regards, it’s the same application that you can download from the MobileXPRT site.

We will make the source for the release available to the community in a few days.

We have some MobileXPRT results on the Web site. Some of these results are from our own testing and some are from published articles like this one from Tom’s Hardware. We will be adding more results from devices we test and looking for more articles as time goes on.

We’d love to add your results as well. You can find out how to submit your results here. If you have a blog or publish your own reviews, send us the link. If we include your results, we will link back to your site.

Now on to the next great thing!

Eric

Comment on this post in the forums

MobileXPRT 2013 lives!

On behalf of the BenchmarkXPRT Development Community, I’m proud to announce that today we are releasing MobileXPRT 2013. MobileXPRT is our benchmark for measuring the performance of Android-based devices. Like the other benchmarks (or XPRTs as we sometimes call them), MobileXPRT attempts to measure performance by using activities that real users do on their devices. For more information, check out our press release http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/8/prweb11016543.htm.

We still have more to do over the next few days. We need to release the source, which we expect to do later this week. We need to make MobileXPRT 2013 available on Google Play. We’ll also work to add more results to our MobileXPRT 2013 results database. Watch this space for more details!

I’d also like to thank those of you that have helped us by developing, testing, or commenting on the Community Preview release. Your efforts have been an important part of making this benchmark available to a larger audience. Please continue to let us know your thoughts, send us your results, and tell us about any problems you find.

Benchmark development is never done!

Bill

Comment on this post in the forums

Fragments

The folks over at OpenSignal have created some pretty impressive visualizations of how fragmented the Android marketplace is. Pictures like that are a little daunting as we head to the public release of MobileXPRT 2013. However, the benchmark is looking pretty stable. Since we released MobileXPRT CP1.1 back in June, we have not encountered any problem configurations.

That includes our first encounter with the recently released Android 4.3. We tested MobileXPRT 2013 CP 1.1 on a Nexus 7 running Android 4.3. The benchmark ran with no problem. Here are the scores, along with scores from the same device running Android 4.2.2.

Android 4.2.2

Android 4.3

MobileXPRT performance

116

120

MobileXPRT user experience

97

98

Of course, WebXPRT 2013 ran on Android 4.3 as well. If you’re curious, here are the scores.

Android 4.2.2 Android 4.3
WebXPRT

183

185

While the upgrade did not have a big effect on the score in the case of the Nexus 7, we will need to test on more devices before we can make a definitive statement about the effect of Android 4.3.3 on performance.

Eric

Comment on this post in the forums

Check out the other XPRTs:

Forgot your password?