A Principled Technologies report: Hands-on testing. Real-world results.

A woman in an office working on the HP ZBook Ultra G1a

Achieve more with the HP ZBook Ultra G1a

In our benchmark tests, two configurations of this mobile workstation—each featuring a different AMD Ryzen processor—delivered stronger performance than a 14-inch Apple MacBook Pro

Modern professionals need portable workstations that can keep up with demanding workloads. Whether you’re rendering graphics, training AI models, or producing creative content, chip performance directly impacts productivity. Better-performing systems can shorten project timelines, enable smoother multitasking, and help teams deliver results from anywhere. Mobile workstations such as the HP ZBook Ultra G1a combine workstation-class power with the flexibility of a lightweight laptop, making them potentially well-suited for CPU-, GPU-, and NPU-intensive workflows.

To evaluate performance, we used industry-standard benchmarks across a range of processor- and graphics-intensive scenarios. Our comparisons included two configurations of the 14-inch HP ZBook Ultra G1a Mobile Workstation PC, powered by AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO processors, and a 14-inch Apple MacBook Pro powered by the Apple M4 Pro processor.

The HP ZBook Ultra G1a with AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO processor demonstrated clear advantages over the Apple MacBook Pro in our testing, offering stronger performance across productivity, graphics, AI, and creative workloads.

Improve productivity with up to 67% higher general performance. Speed graphics work with up to 60% better performance. Better harness the power of AI with up to 26X stronger inference performance.

To assess general productivity, graphics, on-device AI, and creative workload performance, we ran these benchmarks:

  • PassMark PerformanceTest 11.1
  • Cinebench R23
  • 3DMark
  • Procyon AI Computer Vision
  • Geekbench AI GPU
  • Chaos V-Ray CPU

HP provided the systems. The results we report reflect the specific configurations we tested. Any difference in the configurations you test, as well as screen brightness, network traffic, or software additions, can affect these results. For a deeper dive into our testing parameters and procedures, see the science behind the report.

What we learned: Performance & productivity

From running design software and editing large files to juggling multiple apps at once, modern workloads can quickly push a mobile device’s limits. Faster and more powerful computing capabilities can boost responsiveness, reduce wait times, and create a smoother overall experience. These improvements can make daily tasks feel easier and help improve productivity when deadlines are tight or when projects are complex. To gauge overall hardware performance of the mobile workstations, we ran two key tests: PassMark PerformanceTest 11.1 and Cinebench R23.

PassMark PerformanceTest 11.1 benchmark suite stresses CPU, 2D and 3D graphics, storage, and memory through different tests. The CPU test executes complex mathematical calculations involving compression, encryption, and physics simulations.8 This score helps with systems comparisons because it reflects raw processing power.

Cinebench R23 tests how fast a CPU can render a 3D scene.9 The faster it finishes, the higher the score. Because it uses many cores at once, the Cinebench multi-core score indicates how a processor might handle demanding, multi-threaded tasks in everyday use in addition to rendering capability.

Higher is better. Chart title Up to 67% better processor performance. Bar chart showing PassMark PerformanceTest — CPU Mark score (median) results. Bars compare three systems. HP ZBook Ultra G1a with AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 scored 54,272; HP ZBook Ultra with AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 scored 45,850; and Apple MacBook Pro M4 Pro scored 32,432.
PassMark PerformanceTest 11.1 CPU Mark score. Source: PT.
Higher is better. Chart Title Up to 49% better CPU multi core performance. Bar chart showing Cinebench R23 — CPU Multi Core (median). Bars compare three systems: HP ZBook Ultra G1a with Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 scored 29,737; HP ZBook Ultra with Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 scored 25,023; and Apple MacBook Pro with M4 Pro scored 19,829.
Cinebench R23 multi-core scores. Source: PT.

What we learned: Graphics tests

While these mobile workstations are more geared for work than play, strong gaming performance can signal faster response times in graphics-heavy professional workloads such as financial analysis, scientific simulations, and product design. The 3DMark Steel Nomad Light, Solar Bay, and Wildlife Extreme Unlimited tests evaluate a system’s hardware and estimate the frame rates (in frames per second, or FPS) it can deliver during GPU-intensive tasks. In addition to FPS results, the benchmark provides overall scores that make comparing systems straightforward.10 The 3DMark tests we ran do not have CPU components, but if the CPU cannot submit work to the GPU fast enough, it could invalidate the result of the test. 11, 12, 13

  • Steel Nomad Light: Multi-threaded benchmark that measures GPU performance with a non-ray traced, game-like workload across DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1, and Metal
  • Wild Life Extreme Unlimited: Uses varied geometry, lighting, and effects to deliver consistent chip-to-chip comparisons
  • Solar Bay Unlimited: Ray-tracing benchmark with reflections, lighting, and effects that runs three progressively demanding scenes using Vulkan 1.1 at 2560×1440 resolution
Higher scores are better. Chart title Up to 60% higher GPU graphics performance. Bar charts showing GPU performance results on three different 3DMark workloads. Charts compare three systems. On the Steel Nomad Light workload, the HP ZBook Ultra G1a with AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 scored 9,826 (72 fps); the HP ZBook Ultra G1a with AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 scored 8,784 (65 fps); and the 14-inch Apple MacBook Pro with Apple M4 Pro scored 6,757 (50 fps). On the Solar Bay Unlimited workload, the HP ZBook Ultra G1a with AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 scored 46,033 (175 fps); the HP ZBook Ultra G1a with AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 scored 41,567 (158 fps); and the 14-inch Apple MacBook Pro with Apple M4 Pro scored 28,748 (109 fps). On the Wild Life Extreme Unlimited workload, the HP ZBook Ultra G1a with AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 scored 20,945 (125 fps); the HP ZBook Ultra G1a with AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 scored 19,415 (116 fps); and the 14-inch Apple MacBook Pro with Apple M4 Pro scored 16,277 (97 fps).
3DMark workload results. Higher is better. Source: PT.

What we learned: AI tests

As AI models and processes become faster, more capable, and cheaper to run, organizations are integrating them into a growing range of workflows to accelerate decision-making and innovation. Businesses are using AI to automate routine tasks, derive deeper insights from data, and augment human decision-making in complex scenarios. This shift is yielding tangible performance improvements. For example, one field study found that equipping customer service agents with an AI assistant boosted their productivity by about 14 percent, with the largest gains among less-experienced workers.14 The finding underscores how AI-driven transformation can help boost productivity and overall business performance.

Procyon AI Computer Vision Benchmark – float32

AI and ML technologies are transforming how professionals approach complex tasks, but that innovation requires serious computing power. These workloads are both data- and processor-intensive, making a strong CPU essential for staying productive. Whether it’s running computer vision at the edge, analyzing 3D images, or classifying objects, faster performance can mean finishing tasks sooner and focusing on what comes next. To measure this capability, Procyon AI Computer Vision Benchmark evaluates inference performance across multiple AI engines, delivering an overall score as well as total inference counts per model. In our testing, we used Windows Machine Learning (ML) as the inference engine with the DirectML GPU backend on the two configurations of the HP ZBook Ultra G1a and the Apple Core ML engine for the MacBook, and we ran the following models using the single-precision (FP32) format:15

  • MobileNetV3 and ResNet-50: 16,17,18 Commonly applied in image recognition, object detection, and classification tasks across research, technology, and commercial settings; MobileNetV3 targets mobile devices (e.g., the mobile workstations we tested)
  • Real-ESRGAN:19 Used in industries such as digital media, healthcare, and real estate to improve image clarity and resolution with Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)-based enhancement
Higher scores are better. Chart Title is a banner reading Up to 26X times better AI inference performance. Bar charts showing Procyon AI Computer Vision Benchmark (FP32) results. Charts show overall score and three sub-scores for each of three systems. Overall scores were as follows: the HP ZBook Ultra G1a with AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 scored 569; the HP ZBook Ultra G1a with AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 scored 546; and the 14 inch Apple MacBook Pro with Apple M4 Pro scored 391. MobileNet V3 total inferences were as follows: the HP ZBook Ultra G1a with AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 achieved 71,357; the HP ZBook Ultra G1a with AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 achieved 71,362; and the 14 inch Apple MacBook Pro with Apple M4 Pro achieved 43,179. ResNet 50 total inferences were as follows: the HP ZBook Ultra G1a with AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 achieved 15,155; the HP ZBook Ultra G1a with AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 achieved 15,267; and the 14 inch Apple MacBook Pro with Apple M4 Pro achieved 7,628. Real ESRGAN total inferences were as follows: the HP ZBook Ultra G1a with AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 achieved 3,990; the HP ZBook Ultra G1a with AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 achieved 3,904; and the 14 inch Apple MacBook Pro with Apple M4 Pro achieved 147.
Procyon AI Computer Vision Benchmark FP32 workload results. Higher is better. Source: PT

Geekbench AI GPU

Geekbench AI evaluates CPU, GPU, and NPU performance using real-world ML tasks.20 For our testing, we used the Open Neural Network Exchange (ONNX) framework with the DirectML GPU backend on the two HP ZBook Ultra G1a configurations, and the Apple Core ML engine with the GPU backend on the 14-inch MacBook Pro. We ran tests in both single-precision (FP32) and half-precision (FP16) formats. FP32 results are more relevant for workloads that demand accuracy—such as medical imaging or advanced deep learning—while FP16 results are useful for scenarios where speed and efficiency take priority, such as training smaller datasets or models.

Higher scores are better. Chart title Up to 54% better AI inference performance. Bar charts showing Geekbench AI GPU results at two precision levels. Bars compare three systems. For single precision (FP32) level, the HP ZBook Ultra G1a with AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 scored 20,387; the HP ZBook Ultra G1a with AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 scored 18,259; and the 14 inch Apple MacBook Pro with Apple M4 Pro scored 14,756. For half precision (FP16) level, the HP ZBook Ultra G1a with AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 scored 25,661; the HP ZBook Ultra G1a with AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 scored 21,067; and the 14 inch Apple MacBook Pro with Apple M4 Pro scored 16,598.
Geekbench AI GPU FP32 and FP16 workload results. Higher is better. Source: PT

What we learned: Creative tests

Creative professionals rely on powerful workstations to handle demanding workflows such as video editing, image processing, and digital content creation. These workloads can combine heavy CPU, GPU, and memory usage, so performance directly affects how quickly projects move from concept to completion. Benchmarking creative applications provides insight into how well a workstation can support these real-world tasks, helping deliver potential gains in productivity and responsiveness.

Higher scores are better. Chart Title Up to 43% better rendering performance.Bar chart showing V-Ray CPU rendering benchmark overall score. Bars compare three systems. The HP ZBook Ultra G1a with Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 scored 33,718; the HP ZBook Ultra G1a with Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 390 scored 27,676; and the Apple MacBook Pro with M4 Pro scored 23,429.
Chaos V-Ray CPU workload results. Higher is better. Source: PT.

The Chaos V-Ray Benchmark measures system rendering performance using CPUs, GPUs, or both together. It evaluates rendering speed with V-Ray 6 engines powered by RTX and CUDA technologies.21

Conclusion

Our testing shows that the HP ZBook Ultra G1a Mobile Workstation PC, powered by an AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO processor, outperformed its 14-inch counterpart Apple MacBook Pro in several key workloads. The ZBook Ultra G1a delivered up to 67 percent higher general productivity performance, up to 60 percent better graphics performance, up to 26 times stronger AI inference performance, and up to 43 percent faster rendering performance. In these tests, the ZBook Ultra G1a configuration with the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 processor performed the best, but both AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO processor configurations performed well and better than the 14-inch Apple MacBook Pro with Apple M4 Pro chip. For professionals who rely on mobile systems for these and other CPU-, GPU-, and NPU-intensive workflows, these performance advantages could translate into shorter project timelines, smoother multitasking, and greater flexibility for working on the go. The HP ZBook Ultra G1a combines workstation-class power with mobility, which can help your teams save time and stay productive wherever work happens.

  1. AMD, “AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395,” accessed October 3, 2025, https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/laptop/ryzen-pro/ai-max-pro-300-series/amd-ryzen-ai-max-plus-pro-395.html.
  2. TechPowerUp, “AMD Strix Halo,” accessed October 3, 2025, https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/amd-strix-halo.g1096.
  3. HP, “HP ZBook Ultra,” accessed September 19, 2025, https://www.hp.com/us-en/workstations/zbook-ultra.html.
  4. HP, “HP ZBook Ultra.”
  5. HP, “HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 inch Mobile Workstation PC,” accessed September 19, 2025, h20195.www2.hp.com/v2/GetPDF.aspx/c09086128.
  6. HP, “HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 inch Mobile Workstation PC.”
  7. HP, “HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 inch Mobile Workstation PC.”
  8. PassMark Software, “PerformanceTest,” accessed September 19, 2025, https://www.passmark.com/products/performancetest/index.php.
  9. TechSpot, “MAXON Cinebench R23,” accessed September 19, 2025, https://www.techspot.com/downloads/7579-cinebench-r23.html.
  10. UL Solutions, “3DMark user guide,” accessed September 19, 2025, https://support.benchmarks.ul.com/support/solutions/articles/44002146295-3dmark-user-guide.
  11. UL Solutions, “Steel Nomad Graphics Test,” accessed October 3, 2025, https://support.benchmarks.ul.com/support/solutions/articles/44002528074-steel-nomad-graphics-test.
  12. UL Solutions, “Solar Bay Graphics Test,” accessed October 3, 2025, https://support.benchmarks.ul.com/support/solutions/articles/44002466575-solar-bay-graphics-test.
  13. UL Solutions, “Wild Life Extreme Graphics test,” accessed October 3, 2025, https://support.benchmarks.ul.com/support/solutions/articles/44002201774-wild-life-extreme-graphics-test.
  14. Stanford University Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, “Will Generative AI Make You More Productive at Work? Yes, But Only If You’re Not Already Great at Your Job.” Accessed September 22, 2025, https://hai.stanford.edu/news/will-generative-ai-make-you-more-productive-work-yes-only-if-youre-not-already-great-your-job.
  15. UL Solutions, “AI Inference Engines,” accessed September 22, 2025, https://support.benchmarks.ul.com/support/solutions/articles/44002386123-ai-inference-engines.
  16. UL Solutions, “Benchmark tests,” accessed September 22, 2025, https://support.benchmarks.ul.com/support/solutions/articles/44002386124-benchmark-tests.
  17. Activeloop, “MobileNetV3,” accessed September 22, 2025, https://www.activeloop.ai/resources/glossary/mobile-net-v-3/.
  18. Roboflow, “What is ResNet-50?” accessed September 22, 2025, https://blog.roboflow.com/what-is-resnet-50/.
  19. Llain, Maria, “Restoring Image Quality With AI using Real-ESRGAN and SwinIR,” accessed September 22, 2025, https://medium.com/@mariallain/restoring-image-quality-with-ai-using-real-esrgan-and-swinir-20d54c483e39.
  20. Geekbench, “Introducing Geekbench AI,” accessed September 23, 2025, https://www.geekbench.com/ai/.
  21. Chaos, “How fast is V-Ray on your hardware?” accessed September 23, 2025, https://www.chaos.com/vray/benchmark?srsltid=AfmBOooSmUTW7VCzZdD-wc_w4egZ-scIiEPgjPtJz3JuaOuSZvSKUV3Q.

This project was commissioned by HP.

October 2025

Principled Technologies is a registered trademark of Principled Technologies, Inc.

All other product names are the trademarks of their respective owners.

Forgot your password?