A Principled Technologies report: Hands-on testing. Real-world results.

Expedite complex workflows with an HP ZBook 8 G1a Mobile Workstation

We compared this system’s general productivity, computer vision, and content creation performance to that of comparable AMD Ryzen™ AI 9 HX PRO 370 processor-based Lenovo and Dell mobile workstations

As the size and breadth of demanding applications in high-performance fields continue to grow, so do workstation expectations. The HP ZBook 8 G1a Mobile Workstation delivers pro-level performance with next-gen AMD Ryzen AI 300 Series processors. These processors contain CPU, GPU, and neural processing unit (NPU) architecture, which accelerates AI and machine learning (ML) workloads. A characteristic of the system that can play an important role with AI-enhanced workloads is how many trillions of operations per second (TOPS) an NPU is rated for.

The highest NPU TOPS-rated AMD Ryzen AI 300 Series processor available with the HP ZBook 8 G1a Mobile Workstation is the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 processor, at 55 NPU TOPS. That’s 5 NPU TOPS more than you’d get with Lenovo® ThinkPad® P14S Gen 6 and Dell Pro Max 14 mobile workstations, which contain, at the highest level, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 processors (50 NPU TOPS). That difference showed up when we compared the performance of these three systems on several different AI-related benchmarks, where the HP system came out on top. Read on to learn more.

Boost productivity. Up to 10.3 percent faster CPU multi-core performance based on Cinebench 2024 results. Accelerate industry-specific workflows. Up to 13.2 percent higher SPECworkstation 4.0 (Energy) results. Export Revit files In less time. Up to 32 minutes and 9 seconds faster based on Revit 2024 RFO Benchmark (DWG) results.

What and how we tested

We equipped these 14-inch Windows 11 Pro mobile workstations with the best AMD Ryzen AI 300 Series processor available for each model, integrated AMD Radeon 890M graphics, 64 GB of memory, and 1 TB of storage:

The results we report reflect the specific configurations we tested. Any difference in the configurations—as well as screen brightness, network traffic, and software additions—can affect these results. For a deeper dive into our testing parameters and procedures, see the science behind the report.

We compared general productivity, computer vision, and content creation performance using these benchmarks:

  • Cadalyst System Benchmark 2015
  • Cinebench 2024
  • Geekbench 6
  • Maxon RedShift Benchmark
  • Procyon® AI Computer Vision Benchmark
  • Revit 2024 RFO Benchmark
  • SPECworkstation 4.0

Note: The graphs in this report use different scales to keep a consistent size. Please be mindful of each graph’s data range as you compare.

General productivity performance

When you and your team are spending your days tackling time-sensitive tasks, even small performance bumps based on real-world usage can make a difference.

To reflect the experience of business professionals, we ran two CPU-intensive benchmarks. The Cinebench 2024 benchmark renders a 3D scene with Redshift for Cinema 4D software,9 and the Geekbench 6 benchmark executes multiple CPU-intensive tasks simultaneously.10 Strong CPU multi-core performance enables users to run multiple applications at once and allows background processes to run without slowing down everything else. Strong single-core performance may translate to, among other things, a smoother single application user interface.

Chart of Cinebench 2024 CPU multi-core scores. Higher is better. HP ZBook 8 G1a score 1,142; Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 score 1,035; Dell Pro Max 14 score 1,134. Up to 10.3 percent higher CPU multi-core performance for superior multitasking and faster content creation.
Cinebench 2024 CPU multi-core scores. Source: PT.
Chart of Geekbench 6 results. Higher is better. CPU single-core scores. HP ZBook 8 G1a score 2,955; Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 score 2,935; Dell Pro Max 14 score 2,902. CPU multi-core scores. HP ZBook 8 G1a score 15,386; Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 score 15,185; Dell Pro Max 14 score 15,231. Up to 1.8 percent higher CPU single-core performance for smoother single app responsiveness.
Geekbench 6 results. Source: PT.

AI inference performance

Being able to run computer vision applications on device instead of in the cloud is a game-changer for many organizations. Keeping sensitive data local reduces the risk of data breaches and can even help with compliance efforts.

To measure performance with INT8 (8-bit integer) precision—a level of precision that optimizes for inference times—we ran the UL Procyon AI Computer Vision Benchmark.11 The benchmark measures NPU performance using the following AI inference engines:

  • DeepLabv3 for semantic image segmentation tasks.12
  • Inception-v4 for object detection tasks.13
  • Real-ESGRAN for image upscaling tasks.14
  • ResNet-50 for image classification tasks.15
  • YOLOv3 is used for real-time object detection and quality inspection within visual data.16

While the HP ZBook 8 G1a edged out the competitor systems in overall performance, it also scored 4.0 percent higher in DeepLabv3 and 3.7 percent higher in the ResNet-50 models. For all of the Procyon AI Computer Vision Benchmark sub-scores, see the science behind the report.

Chart of Procyon AI Computer Vision Benchmark (Integer) overall scores. Higher is better. HP ZBook 8 G1a score 1,809; Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 score 1,770; Dell Pro Max 14 score 1,794. Up to 2.2 percent better AI inference performance for faster image and video processing.
Procyon AI Computer Vision Benchmark overall scores. Source: PT.

Content creation performance

Managing increasingly complex projects with multiple contributors, resource-intensive applications, and tight deadlines are just a few pain points that the right technology can help alleviate. By reducing scene rendering, model creation, and collateral export times, your creative team has more time to iterate on new ideas, and you can get projects out the door faster. Plus, smoother navigation enables computer-aided design (CAD) and Revit professionals to immerse themselves within complex 2D and 3D models.

Complete 3D rendering tasks in less time

To reflect the experience of professionals who handle resource-intensive architectural visualization, animation, visual effects, and product design workloads, we rendered a 3D scene using the Maxon Redshift Benchmark command-line tool. These results exclude “certain CPU operations such as loading the scene or textures from disk.”17

Create models in less time

For architects, engineers, and construction professionals, we ran the Revit 2024 RFO Benchmark, which uses the Redshift rendering engine to perform model creation and view export tasks.18

Chart of Redshift Benchmark 3D rendering results. Time in minutes and seconds. Lower is better. HP ZBook 8 G1a time 32:22; Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 time 34:11; Dell Pro Max 14 time 33:44. Complete 3D rendering tasks up to 1 minute and 49 seconds faster.
Redshift Benchmark 3D rendering results. Source: PT.
Chart of Revit 2024 RFO model creation benchmark results. Time in minutes and seconds. Lower is better. HP ZBook 8 G1a time 3:02; Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 time 4:07; Dell Pro Max 14 time 4:15. Create models up to 1 minute and 13 seconds faster.
Revit 2024 RFO model creation benchmark results. Source: PT.

Export files in less time

Just as design professionals need to export work for many different use cases and review stages, the Revit 2024 RFO Benchmark exports different file formats. Its CAD use cases include:

  • Design Web Format (DWF) for sharing CAD drawings and design data with stakeholders who may not have CAD software.
  • Drawing (DWG) for sharing and collaborating on CAD files with other designers.
  • Portable Document Format (PDF) for sharing, printing, and archiving documents that are openable and viewable on almost any device.
  • Portable Network Graphics (PNG) for web graphics, digital art, and screenshots where image clarity is crucial.

In these tasks, the HP ZBook 8 G1a provided a clear time advantage. Significantly faster exports mean CAD users can get collateral into review faster, complete projects in less time, and handle more work.

Chart of Revit 2024 RFO export benchmark results. Time in minutes and seconds. Lower is better. Export in DWF format. HP ZBook 8 G1a time 8:51; Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 time 15:00; Dell Pro Max 14 time 13:25. Export in DWG format. HP ZBook 8 G1a time 49:38; Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 time 79:09; Dell Pro Max 14 time 81:47. Export in PDF format. HP ZBook 8 G1a time 68:35; Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 time 95:34; Dell Pro Max 14 time 95:42. Export in PNG format. HP ZBook 8 G1a time 11:14; Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 time 14:52; Dell Pro Max 14 time 15:13. Export Drawing (DWG) file formats up to 32 minutes and 9 seconds faster.
Revit 2024 RFO export benchmark results. Source: PT.

Complete drafting and design tasks in less time

To reflect the experience of master builders, planners, and designers, we ran Cadalyst System Benchmark 2015, which measures 3D graphics, 2D graphics, disk, and CPU performance and produces a total index score.19

Chart of Cadalyst System Benchmark for AutoCAD total index scores. Higher is better. HP ZBook 8 G1a score 651; Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 score 649; Dell Pro Max 14 score 625. Up to 4.1 percent better AutoCAD performance for faster drawing cleanup and revisions.
Cadalyst Systems Benchmark 2015 results. Source: PT

Accelerate industry-specific workflows

Finally, we ran the SPECworkstation 4.0 benchmark. This benchmark measures AI accelerator, CPU, graphics, and storage performance from many perspectives.20 The higher the industry vertical score, the faster you would expect that workstation to perform during real-world usage in that area.

Chart of SPECworkstation 4.0 benchmark overall scores. Higher is better. AI & Machine Learning. HP ZBook 8 G1a score 1.29; Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 score 1.17; Dell Pro Max 14 score 1.19. Energy. HP ZBook 8 G1a score 1.28; Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 score 1.13; Dell Pro Max 14 score 1.17. Financial Services. HP ZBook 8 G1a score 1.16; Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 score 0.93; Dell Pro Max 14 score 1.22. Life Sciences. HP ZBook 8 G1a score 1.35; Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 score 1.23; Dell Pro Max 14 score 1.31. Media & Entertainment. HP ZBook 8 G1a score 1.42; Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 score 1.26; Dell Pro Max 14 score 1.40. Product Design. HP ZBook 8 G1a score 1.29; Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 score 1.24; Dell Pro Max 14 score 1.14.Complete industry-specific workflow tasks up to 13.2 percent faster.
SPECworkstation 4.0 benchmark results. Source: PT.

Conclusion

Our hands-on testing shows that investing in the HP ZBook 8 G1a Mobile Workstation powered by an AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 processor brings real-world gains. Across a variety of benchmarks, the 14-inch HP ZBook 8 G1a consistently finished ahead of comparable Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 and Dell Pro Max 14 mobile workstations powered by AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 processors. And, while some of the wins were small, others were significant. For example, based on the Revit 2024 RFO Benchmark results, you could save between 3 minutes and over half an hour, per export, depending on the file format. When you spend your days tackling time-sensitive tasks, any advantage, especially those based on real-world usage, can make a big difference.

  1. AMD, “AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375,” accessed October 31, 2025, https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/laptop/ryzen/ai-300-series/amd-ryzen-ai-9-hx-375.html.
  2. AMD, “AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370,” accessed October 31, 2025, https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/laptop/ryzen-pro/ai-300-series/amd-ryzen-ai-9-hx-pro-370.html.
  3. AMD, “AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.”
  4. AMD, “AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375,” accessed October 31, 2025, https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/laptop/ryzen/ai-300-series/amd-ryzen-ai-9-hx-375.html.
  5. HP, “HP ZBook 8 G1a 14 Mobile Workstation PC with 3 Yr Warranty & Wolf Security,” accessed October 31, 2025, https://www.hp.com/us-en/shop/pdp/hp-zbook-8-g1as-14-inch-mobile-workstation-pc-wolf-pro-security-edition-p-c01g2ua-aba-1.
  6. HP, “HP ZBook 8 G1a 14 Mobile Workstation,” accessed October 31, 2025, https://h20195.www2.hp.com/v2/getpdf.aspx/c09133730.pdf.
  7. Lenovo, “ThinkPad P14s Gen 6 (14” AMD) Mobile Workstation,” accessed October 31, 2025, https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/p/laptops/thinkpad/thinkpadp/thinkpad-p14s-gen-6-14-inch-amd-mobile-workstation/21ql001wus?orgRef=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.google.com%252F&srsltid=AfmBOooQ-b0Mq00Pd1y7N4V0FIXMUcaFXyOwo5K8oJO-ShLm7ETtfOG9.
  8. Dell, “Dell Pro Max 14 Laptop,” accessed October 31, 2025, https://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/dell-laptops/dell-pro-max-14-laptop/spd/dell-pro-max-mc14255-laptop/xcto_mc14255_usx?redirectTo=SOC.
  9. Maxon, Cinebench,” accessed October 31, 2025, https://www.maxon.net/en/cinebench?srsltid=AfmBOoq3jePUR91HPyM2RkVYTezcZaasjsWPMI9ulTTC_EYQCB6TL6JC.
  10. Geekbench, “Geekbench 6 Editions,” accessed October 31, 2025, https://www.geekbench.com/editions/.
  11. UL Solutions, “Procyon® AI Computer Vision Benchmark,” accessed October 31, 2025, https://benchmarks.ul.com/procyon/ai-inference-benchmark-for-windows.
  12. Ikomia, “Understanding DeepLabV3 in Image Segmentation,” accessed October 31, 2025, https://www.ikomia.ai/blog/understanding-deeplabv3-image-segmentation.
  13. GeeksforGeeks, “Inception-V4 and Inception-ResNets,” accessed October 31, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/machine-learning/inception-v4-and-inception-resnets/
  14. Real ESGRAN, “Restore Image Quality with AI using Real ESGRAN,” accessed October 31, 2025, https://realesrgan.com.
  15. Petru P., “What is ResNet-50?” accessed October 31, 2025, https://blog.roboflow.com/what-is-resnet-50/.
  16. Petru P., “What is YOLOv3? An Introductory Guide,” accessed October 31, 2025, https://blog.roboflow.com/what-is-yolov3/.
  17. Maxon, “The redshiftBenchmark tool, “ accessed November 3, 2025, https://help.maxon.net/r3d/maya/en-us/Content/html/The+redshiftBenchmark+tool.html.
  18. Revit Forum, “RFO Benchmark v3.# (Updated for 2025),” accessed November 3, 2025, https://www.revitforum.org/forum/revit-all-flavors/hardware-and-infrastructure/36875-rfo-benchmark-v3-updated-for-2025.
  19. Cadalyst, “ Test Your Hardware Systems Running AutoCAD 2026 or Earlier.” Accessed November 3, 2025, https://info.cadalyst.com/cad-benchmark-test.
  20. SPEC GWPG, “SPECworkstation 4.0,” accessed November 3, 2025, https://gwpg.spec.org/benchmarks/benchmark/specworkstation-4_0/.

This project was commissioned by HP.

January 2026

Principled Technologies is a registered trademark of Principled Technologies, Inc.

All other product names are the trademarks of their respective owners.

Forgot your password?