We have produced the following currently publicly available reports for Intel Corp. Reports are listed with the most recent first.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Motherboard testing: Ease of integration We tested the following motherboards to determine which would be easiest and fastest for small computer vendors to integrate:  Asus P5Q-VM, Gigabyte GA-EG45M-DS2H, Intel DG45ID, and MSI G45M-FIDR.

 

Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors (full report and one-page summary) We tested the following notebooks: an HP 2133 Mini-Note PC with a VIA C7-M 1.20GHz processor, an HP 530 Notebook PC with an Intel Celeron M 520 1.60GHz processor, and an HP Compaq 6720s Notebook PC with an Intel Celeron 550 2.00GHz processor. We ran five custom consumer application tests.

64-bit Black-Scholes financial workload performance and power consumption on multiprocessor Intel- and AMD-based servers We measured the 64-bit Black-Scholes financial application-based workload performance and power consumption on servers using the following three processors: AMD Opteron processor 8360 SE, Intel Xeon processor X7350, and Intel Xeon processor X7460.

64-bit SunGard Adaptiv Analytics Benchmark financial workload performance and power consumption on multiprocessor Intel- and AMD-based servers We measured the performance of the 64-bit SunGard Adaptiv Analytics Benchmark workload on servers using the following three processors:  AMD Opteron processor 8360 SE, Intel Xeon processor X7350, and Intel Xeon processor X7460.

SPEC CPU2006 SPECint_rate performance and power consumption on multiprocessor Intel- and AMD-based servers We measured the SPEC CPU2006 performance and power consumption on servers using the following three processors: AMD Opteron processor 8360 SE, Intel Xeon processor X7350, and Intel Xeon processor X7460.

vConsolidate performance and power on Intel- and AMD-based servers running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.2 We measured power and performance with Intel’s vConsolidate version 2.0 (Profile 3) workload on quad-processor servers running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.2 using the following processors: AMD Opteron processor 8360 S, Intel Xeon processor X7350, and Intel Xeon processor X7460.

vConsolidate performance and power on quad- and dual-processor Intel- and AMD-based servers We measured performance and power with Intel’s vConsolidate version 2.0 (Profile 2) workload using Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V on quad-processor servers using the following processors: Intel Xeon processor X7460, Intel Xeon processor X7350, AMD Opteron processor 8360 SE, Intel Xeon processor X5470.

vConsolidate performance on quad-processor Intel processor-based servers We measured performance and power with Intel’s vConsolidate version 2.0 (Profile 2) workload using Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V on quad-processor servers using the following processors: Intel Xeon processor X7460 and Intel Xeon processor X7350.

 

Performance of four Intel-and AMD-based servers SMB servers using WebBench, LoadSim, and SysBench We measured the performance while running multiple benchmarks simultaneously on small and medium-sized business (SMB) focused servers using the following processors: Intel Pentium® Dual-core processor E2160, Quad-Core Intel Xeon® processor X3220, and Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X3350.

 

 

Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors (full report, one-page summary) We tested the following notebooks: an HP 2133 Mini-Note PC with a VIA C7-M 1.20GHz processor, an HP 530 Notebook PC with an Intel Celeron M 520 1.60GHz processor, and an HP Compaq 6720s Notebook PC with an Intel Celeron 550 2.00GHz processor. We ran five custom consumer application tests.

Performance comparison of two desktop PCs with Intel and AMD processors. We tested systems using an AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core 9500 2.20GHz and an Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.40GHz. We conducted industry-standard benchmarks, custom consumer application tests, and game benchmarks.

Performance of three Intel-based SMB servers using WebBench, LoadSim, and SysBench We tested servers using the following processors: Intel Pentium® Dual-core processor E2160, Quad-Core Intel Xeon® processor X3220, and Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X3350.

 

Intel Modular Server performance on simultaneous email, Web server, Java, and database workloads We measured the system performance of the Intel Modular Server built on Intel Multi-Flex Technology to compare the performance of each Server Compute Module in two states: with that one Server Compute Module running alone and with all Server Compute Modules running simultaneously.

 

Performance and energy consumption of notebook PCs with Intel* and AMD* processors (Vendor 1 report and Vendor 2 report) We tested two pairs of notebook systems. Each pair of systems came from the same vendor and used the following processors: AMD* Turion* 64 X2 TL-60 2.0GHz and Intel Core 2 Duo® T7300 2.0GHz.

 

vConsolidate performance on dual-socket Intel- and AMD-based servers We tested dual-socket servers using three processors: Quad-Core AMD Opteron 2347 (1.9GHz), Quad-Core Intel Xeon X5365 (3.0GHz), and Quad-Core Intel Xeon X5460 (3.16GHz). Note: The AMD processor contains an erratum in the translation lookaside buffer (TLB). According to AMD and industry reports, implementing the BIOS workaround would likely reduce performance. SuperMicro confirmed that the BIOS in the AMD-based servers in this test did not implement the workaround for the AMD TLB erratum.

Performance and battery life ratings of two notebook PCs with Intel processors. We tested two notebook systems: Toshiba Satellite A200-03V, an Intel Pentium dual-core processor T2310-based system, and Toshiba Satellite A200-24V, an Intel Core 2 Duo processor T5250-based systems.