Windows Media Load Simulator performance and power consumption on Intel- and AMD-processor based servers We tested dual-processor servers using the following processors: 64-bit Intel Xeon Processor 3.60 GHz, Dual-Core Intel Xeon Processor 5160, and Dual-Core AMD Opteron 285.
WebBench performance and power consumption on uniprocessor Intel- and AMD-processor-based servers We tested servers using the following processors: AMD Opteron processor model 1214, Intel Pentium D processor 840, Intel Pentium D processor 950, Intel Xeon processor 3070, and Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X3220.
WebBench performance on Intel- and AMD-processor-based servers running Red Hat Enterprise Linux v.4.4 We tested servers using the following processors: Supermicro A+ Server 2021M-T2R+V with dual-core AMD Opteron processor model 2220 SE and Supermicro SuperServer 6025B-T2R+V with Quad-core Intel Xeon processor X5355.
WebBench performance and power consumption on quad-core and dual-core dual-processor servers We tested servers using the following processors: dual-core AMD Opteron processor model 2220 SE, Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 5160, and Quad-core Intel Xeon processor X5355.
WebBench performance and power consumption on Intel Xeon 50xx processor-based servers We tested dual-processor servers using the following processors: Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 5030, Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 5050, and Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 5080.
WebBench performance and power consumption on Intel Xeon 51xx processor-based servers We tested dual-processor servers using the following processors: Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 5110, Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 5130, Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 5150, and Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 5160.
WebBench performance on Intel Server Board S5000VSA with Intel Xeon processor 5160 We tested dual-processor servers using the following motherboards and processors: Intel Server Board SE7520AF2 with Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 2.80 GHz and Intel Server Board S5000VSA with Dual-Core Intel Xeon Processor 5160.
WebBench performance on Intel Server Board S5000PAL with Intel Xeon processor 5160 We tested dual-processor servers using the following motherboards and processors: Intel Server Board SE7520AF2 with Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 2.80 GHz and Intel Server Board S5000PAL with Dual-Core Intel Xeon Processor 5160.
WebBench performance and power consumption on uniprocessor Intel-processor-based servers We tested servers using the following processors: Intel Pentium D processor 840, Intel Pentium D processor 950, and Intel Xeon processor 3070.
Performance of three Intel-based SMB servers using WebBench, LoadSim, and SysBench We tested servers using the following processors: Intel Pentium® Dual-core processor E2160, Quad-Core Intel Xeon® processor X3220, and Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X3350.
WebBench performance on Intel®-based SMB servers We tested three dual- and quad-core small and medium-sized business (SMB) focused servers: Intel Pentium Dual-core processor E2160-based server, Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X3220-based server, and Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor E5335-based server.
SysBench performance on Intel®-based SMB servers We tested three dual- and quad-core small and medium-sized business (SMB) focused servers: Intel Pentium Dual-core processor E2160-based server, Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X3220-based server, and Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor E5335-based server.
Performance of three Intel®-based SMB servers using WebBench, LoadSim, and SysBench We measured performance while running multiple benchmarks simultaneously on three dual- and quad-core small and medium-sized business (SMB) focused servers: Intel Pentium Dual-core processor E2160-based server, Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X3220-based server, and Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor E5335-based server.
SPECjbb2005 performance on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.1 and 3 AS Intel-based servers We tested three servers: a Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 3 server on a Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 7140M-based (3.4 GHz) server, a Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 3 guest on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.1 server on a Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor E7340-based (2.93 GHz) server, and a Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.1 server on a Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor E7340-based (2.93 GHz) server.
SPECjbb2005 performance on Intel- and AMD-processor-based servers running Red Hat Enterprise Linux v.4.4 We tested servers using the following processors: Supermicro A+ Server 2021M-T2R+V with dual-core AMD Opteron processor model 2220 SE and Supermicro SuperServer 6025B-T2R+V with Quad-core Intel Xeon processor X5355.
SPECjbb2005 performance and power consumption on Intel- and AMD-processor-based quad-processor servers We tested quad-processor servers using Dual-core AMD Opteron processor model 8220 SE and Dual-core Intel Xeon processor 7140M processors.
Performance/watt on three dual-core processor servers We tested three servers using the Intel Xeon processor 5148: Dell PowerEdge Energy Smart 2950, HP ProLiant DL380 G5, and IBM System x3650.
SPECjbb2005 performance and power consumption on Intel Xeon 50xx processor-based servers We tested dual-processor servers using the following processors: Dual-core Intel Xeon processor 5030, Dual-core Intel Xeon processor 5050, and Dual-core Intel Xeon processor 5080.
SPECjbb2005 performance and power consumption on Intel Xeon 51xx processor-based servers We tested dual-processor servers using the following processors: Dual-core Intel Xeon processor 5110, Dual-core Intel Xeon processor 5130, Dual-core Intel Xeon processor 5150, and Dual-core Intel Xeon processor 5160.
SPECjbb2005 performance and power consumption on uniprocessor Intel-processor-based servers We tested uniprocessor servers using the following processors: Intel Pentium D processor 840, Intel Pentium D processor 950, and Intel Xeon processor 3070.
SPECjbb2005 performance and power consumption on Intel- and AMD-processor-based servers We tested dual-processor servers using the following processors: 64-bit Intel Xeon processor 3.60 GHz, Dual-core Intel Xeon processor 5160, and dual-core AMD Opteron 285.
vConsolidate performance on IBM and HP quad-core multiprocessor Intel processor-based servers (full report and one-page summary) We measured power and performance with Intel’s vConsolidate OEM version 1 workload using VMware ESX Server 3.5 on two servers: HP ProLiant DL580 G5 and IBM System x3850 M2.
vConsolidate performance on dual-socket Intel- and AMD-based servers We measured performance with Intel’s vConsolidate OEM version 1 workload on dual-socket servers using three processors: Quad-Core AMD Opteron 2347 (1.9GHz), Quad-Core Intel Xeon X5365 (3.0GHz), and Quad-Core Intel Xeon X5460 (3.16GHz). Note: The AMD processor contains an erratum in the translation lookaside buffer (TLB). According to AMD and industry reports, implementing the BIOS workaround would likely reduce performance. SuperMicro confirmed that the BIOS in the AMD-based servers in this test did not implement the workaround for the AMD TLB erratum.
SysBench performance with varying numbers of virtual machines on Intel- and AMD-processor-based quad-processor server We evaluated the performance multiple virtualized instances of SysBench in the following quad-processor servers: HP Proliant DL585 (using the Dual-Core AMD Opteron 885) and Dual-Core Intel Xeon Processor 7140-based server.
SPECjbb2005 performance with varying numbers of virtual machines on Intel- and AMD-processor-based servers We evaluated the performance and power consumption of multiple virtualized instances of SPECjbb2005 in the following dual-processor servers: Dual-Core AMD Opteron 285 (HP Proliant DL385) and Dual-Core Intel Xeon Processor 5160 (Supermicro SuperServer 7045B-8R+B).
SPECfp_rate performance on Dell, HP, and IBM servers We tested three servers: Dell PowerEdge 2970 with two Dual-Core AMD Opteron 2222 SE processors, HP ProLiant DL380 G5 with two Dual-Core Intel Xeon 5160 processors, and IBM System x3650 with two Dual-Core Intel Xeon 5160 processors.
SPEC CPU2006 SPECfp_rate power consumption on Dell, HP, and IBM servers We tested four systems: Dell PowerEdge 2970 with two Dual-Core AMD Opteron 2222 SE processors, Dell PowerEdge 2970 Energy Smart with two Dual-Core AMD Opteron 2212 HE processors, HP ProLiant DL380 G5 with two Dual-Core Intel Xeon 5160 processors, and IBM System x3650 with two Dual-Core Intel Xeon 5160 processors.
SPEC CPU2006 SPECfp_rate_base performance on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.1 and 3 AS Intel-based servers We tested three servers: a Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 3 server on a Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 7140M-based (3.4 GHz) server, a Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 3 guest on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.1 server on a Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X7350-based (2.93 GHz) server, and a Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.1 server on a Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X7350-based (2.93 GHz) server.
SPEC CPU2006 SPECint_rate_base performance on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.1 and 3 AS Intel-based servers We tested three servers: a Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 3 server on a Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 7140M-based (3.4 GHz) server, a Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 3 guest on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.1 server on a Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor E7340-based (2.93 GHz) server, and a Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.1 server on a Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor E7340-based (2.93 GHz) server.
Linpack performance on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.1 and 3 AS Intel-based servers We tested three servers: a Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 3 server on a Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 7140M-based (3.4 GHz) server, a Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 3 guest on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.1 server on a Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor E7340-based (2.93 GHz) server, and a Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.1 server on a Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor E7340-based (2.93 GHz) server.
SPECint_rate_base 2000 performance and power consumption with RHEL v.4.4 on Intel and AMD-processor-based servers We tested servers using the following processors: Supermicro A+ Server 2021M-T2R+V with dual-core AMD Opteron processor model 2220 SE and Supermicro SuperServer 6025B-T2R+V with Quad-core Intel Xeon processor X5355.
SPECfp_rate_base 2000 performance and power consumption with RHEL v.4.4 on Intel- and AMD-processor-based servers We tested the following dual-processor servers: Supermicro A+ Server 2021M-T2R+V with dual-core AMD Opteron processor model 2220 SE and Supermicro SuperServer 6025B-T2R+V with Quad-core Intel Xeon processor X5355.
Linpack HPL performance with RHEL v.4.4 on Intel- and AMD-processor-based servers We tested the following dual-processor servers: Supermicro SuperServer 6025B-TR+V with dual-core AMD Opteron processor model 2220 SE and Supermicro SuperServer 6025B-TR+V with Quad-core Intel Xeon processor X5355.
SPECfp_rate_base 2000 performance and power consumption on uniprocessor Intel-processor-based servers We tested following processors: Intel Pentium D processor 840, Intel Pentium D processor 950, and Intel Xeon processor 3070.
SPECint_rate_base 2000 performance and power consumption on uniprocessor Intel-processor-based servers We tested uniprocessor servers using the following processors: Intel Pentium D processor 840, Intel Pentium D processor 950, and Intel Xeon processor 3070.
SPECfp_rate_base 2000 performance of leading software compilers on AMD and Intel processor-based servers We tested two compilers, Intel C++ Compiler 9.1 for Linux and GNU gcc 4.1.1, on the following servers: Dual-Core AMD Opteron 285-based server with 8 GB of DDR2 memory and Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 5160-based server with 8 GB of FBD memory.
64-bit Black-Scholes financial workload performance on multi-processor Intel- and AMD-based servers We tested multi-processor servers using the following processors: dual-core AMD Opteron processor model 8220, Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 7140M, Quad-core Intel Xeon processor E7340, and Quad-core Intel Xeon processor X7345.
64-bit Black-Scholes financial workload performance on multi-processor Intel- and AMD-based servers We tested multi-processor servers using the following processors: dual-core AMD Opteron processor model 8222 SE, Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 7140M, and Quad-core Intel Xeon processor X5365, and Quad-core Intel Xeon processor X7350.
Black-Scholes workload performance and power consumption on quad-core and dual-core dual-processor servers We tested dual-processor servers: using the following processors: dual-core AMD Opteron processor model 2220 SE, Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 5160, and Quad-core Intel Xeon processor X5355.
SunGard ACR workload performance and power consumptionon quad-core and dual-core dual-processor servers We tested dual-processor servers: using the following processors: dual-core AMD Opteron processor model 2220 SE, Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 5160, and Quad-core Intel Xeon processor X5355.
SunGard ACR workload performance and power consumption on uniprocessor Intel-processor-based servers We tested uniprocessor servers using the following processors: Intel Pentium D processor 840, Intel Pentium D processor 950, and Intel Xeon processor 3070.
Black-Scholes workload performance and power consumption on uniprocessor Intel-processor-based servers We tested uniprocessor servers using the following processors: Intel Pentium D processor 840, Intel Pentium D processor 950, and Intel Xeon processor 3070.
SysBench performance and power consumption on Intel- and AMD-processor-based servers in a virtualized environment We tested dual-processor servers using the following processors: Dual-Core AMD Opteron 285 (HP Proliant DL385) and Dual-Core Intel Xeon Processor 5160 (Supermicro SuperServer 7045B-8R+B).
We evaluated the performance, power consumption, and out-of-box experience of the Dell PowerEdge 2970 and PowerEdge 2970 Energy Smart servers. We compared them with the HP ProLiant DL380 G5 and the IBM System x3650.
SPEC CPU2006 SPECfp_rate performance on Dell, HP, and IBM servers We tested three servers: Dell PowerEdge 2970 with two Dual-Core AMD Opteron 2222 SE processors, HP ProLiant DL380 G5 with two Dual-Core Intel Xeon 5160 processors, and IBM System x3650 with two Dual-Core Intel Xeon 5160 processors.
SPEC CPU2006 SPECfp_rate power consumption on Dell, HP, and IBM servers We tested four systems: Dell PowerEdge 2970 with two Dual-Core AMD Opteron 2222 SE processors, Dell PowerEdge 2970 Energy Smart with two Dual-Core AMD Opteron 2212 HE processors, HP ProLiant DL380 G5 with two Dual-Core Intel Xeon 5160 processors, and IBM System x3650 with two Dual-Core Intel Xeon 5160 processors.
Out-of-box comparison between Dell, HP, and IBM servers We set up three servers: Dell PowerEdge 2970 Server, HP ProLiant DL380 G5 Storage Server, and IBM System x3650. Due to differences in packaging and design, the times for each step of the setup process for the three systems varied considerably.
Out-of-box comparison between Dell, HP, and IBM servers We compared the out-of-box experience of the following three servers: Dell PowerEdge 2970 Server, HP ProLiant DL380 G5 Storage Server, and IBM System x3650. Due to differences in packaging and design, the times for each step of the setup process for the three systems varied considerably.
Comparative performance test Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.1 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 AS on Intel-based server Red Hat, Inc. and Intel Corp. commissioned us to compare the performance of three servers, a Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 3 server on a Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 7140M-based (3.4 GHz) server, a Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 3 guest on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.1 server on a Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor E7340-based (2.93 GHz) server, and a Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.1 server on a Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor E7340-based (2.93 GHz) server on different workloads. This presentation, which we gave at Fall IDF in San Francisco on September 19, 2007, summarizes our findings on three of the workloads.
Three SPEC workloads test Intel- and IBM-based servers We used SPECjbb2005 and two SPEC CPU2000 workloads to measure the performance and power consumption of servers with the following processors: the Intel Itanium 2 9050 and IBM System p5 550Q POWER5+.
Performance and performance per watt of the Accelrys DMol3 application on Intel- and AMD-processor-based servers PT tested dual-processor servers using the Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 5160 and Dual-Core AMD Opteron 285 processors.
64-bit Black-Scholes financial workload performance on dual-processor Intel- and AMD-based servers We tested dual-processor servers using the following five processors: Dual-Core AMD Opteron 2220 (2.8GHz), Dual-Core Intel Xeon 5160 (3.0GHz), Quad-Core AMD Opteron 2347 (1.9GHz), Quad-Core Intel Xeon X5365 (3.0GHz), Quad-Core Intel Xeon X5460 (3.16GHz).
64-bit Black-Scholes financial workload performance and power consumption on dual-processor Intel- and AMD-based servers We tested dual-processor servers using the following three processors: Quad-Core AMD Opteron 2347 (1.9GHz), Quad-Core Intel Xeon E5345 (2.33GHz), Quad-Core Intel Xeon E5450 (3.0GHz).
Windows Server 2008 SPECjbb2005 performance and power consumption on Dell, HP, and IBM blade servers We tested three dual-socket blade servers: Dell PowerEdge M600, HP BladeSystem c-Class, and IBM BladeCenter H Type 8852.
Intel Modular Server performance on simultaneous email, Web server, Java, and database workloads We measured the system performance of the Intel Modular Server built on Intel Multi-Flex Technology to compare the performance of each Server Compute Module in two states: with that one Server Compute Module running alone and with all Server Compute Modules running simultaneously.
We evaluated the performance, power consumption, and out-of-box setup experience of the following dual-socket blade servers: Dell PowerEdge M600 Blade System, HP BladeSystem c-Class, and IBM BladeCenter H Type 8852.
Out-of-box comparison between Dell, HP, and IBM blade servers We compared the out-of-box setup experience of the following dual-socket blade servers: Dell PowerEdge M600 Blade System, HP BladeSystem c-Class, and IBM BladeCenter H Type 8852.
SPECjbb2005 performance and power consumption on Dell, HP, and IBM blade servers We tested three dual-socket blade servers: Dell PowerEdge M600 Blade System, HP BladeSystem c-Class, and IBM BladeCenter H Type 8852.
Out-of-box comparison between Dell and HP blade servers We set up two systems: a Dell PowerEdge 1955 Blade System and an HP BladeSystem c-Class. Due to differences in packaging and design, there was a considerable difference in setup times for the two systems.
SPECjbb2005 performance per watt and power consumption on Dell and HP blade servers We tested two dual-processor blade servers: Dell PowerEdge 1955 Blade System and HP BladeSystem c-Class.